apodictic machine-checked praxeology

1.7. Consistency🔗

World cannot be built, so the axioms cannot be shown consistent by building it. What can be built is a frame of the general vocabulary in which every axiom's statement holds, together with the property we intend to add and the theorems' hypotheses. That frame is Apodictic.Model.Toy: one agent, one instant, numbers for ends, and this preference:

🔗def
Apodictic.Model.swapPrefers (X Y : Set ) : Prop
Apodictic.Model.swapPrefers (X Y : Set ) : Prop

The toy preference: X ≻ Y iff they differ by exactly one swap and X's element is the more urgent (smaller number).

In it, swap dominance holds for the plan that serves the most urgent ends, as many as there are units; that plan is actual and homogeneous, ends are decidable, uses are independent, one-unit steps exist within the stock, each step has a marginal end, and preference is asymmetric. So the four axioms have a model with strict preference, and the theorems are neither vacuous nor trivial. That the model transfers to the World axioms is the ordinary model-theoretic reading, which Lean cannot check because World is opaque.